🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.